It now seems a fashion to make stops in some "cassation", and to file referendum questions to promote the acronyms self-styled environmentalists “Without art or part” without social and territorial roots minimally significant. The tour also passed through Umbria by proposing a referendum question that omits the real risks for the fauna to which the Italian wildlife heritage would be exposed. The criticisms of the referendum proposals that we share in some contents come only from the hunting world the "sprinters" of virtual referendums identify with biased ideological fundamentalism and Taliban enemies to be removed from the earth but mind you environmental associations with regular certification of existence and roots that stem from years of environmental battles, some shared by us, others who have seen us in opposing sides such as those against hunting.
These non-suspicious associations, not us, have already denounced in the contents the "referendum" dangers for the Italian wildlife heritage that would derive from the abolition of the law, Possibilities range from "wild hunting" to commercialization and consumerism which would derive from the exploitation of the public good "fauna" only for the purpose of profitable hunting tourism profits as in some countries where there is no adequate protection of fauna biodiversity as the regulations in force allow in an excellent way in Italy and as demonstrated by the censuses and scientific communications with respect to the European panorama. It is not surprising the timing of the gentlemen of the virtual referendum of the "wingmen" who are looking for publicity, coincidentally with the approach of the various electoral rounds suspended by the pandemic.
"Sciacallando" on the sufferings of the Italians, with an eye to the candidacies, they expect better times to present the referendum and be reciprocated perhaps if not with an armchair with a "stool". We are ironic to express a severe criticism ofimproper and manipulative use of one of the most important tools wanted by the constituent fathers in the constitution to protect the weakest of minorities that now someone uses for self-referential advertising "spots". Reflect Parliament on the protection of the Referendum from the spectacularization and find solutions to punish that takes advantage of it for a personalistic and improper use "(Emmanuel Bennati, Regional President of ARCI Caccia dell'Umbria).