Arci Caccia's point of view
In the jumble of denials, repositionings, which we see after the AB conference of last 24/02 we are pleased to learn that, in the battle for the defense of social hunting, a concept of which we claim a "CERTAIN COPYRIGHT" we have, along the way, found unexpected allies: among those who will have to deal with the new design branded Coldiretti, truffle hunters, mushroom hunters and Mrs. Maria with her wild herbs have joined. Furthermore, we are also pleased to enlist the Free Hunting, which we ask to mention the names and surnames of the hunting associations present so as not to remain vague. To help the debate, we do it: the Italian Hunting Federation. Having listened to all the positions, a comment comes to mind: we told you, and also wrote it, in unsuspecting times.
The control room
Now is the time for total clarity and at all levels. The 842, which everyone defends today, can also formally remain standing but, at the same time, be emptied of meaning, for example, as the percentages vary between the territory under social management and that under private management. We have denounced the contradictions that are there for all to see for months. In the control room and also alone within the bodies of the UNA Foundation. So welcome everyone to the "Road to Damascus".
A tight comparison
To the friends of the CNCN we would like to point out that, as we had tried to say in our proposal for a unitary body in the hunting world, it is difficult to dance all the dances without changing the players. Here too, in everyone's interest, reflection is needed, not stamped papers. We too welcome President Prandini's analysis on the role of the hunter and the concern for the mid-hill areas. We will not shy away from the debate, if placed in terms of comparison, regarding the investments of hunters for the spontaneous production, on the territory, of biodiversity (quality game); but it seems to us that we started off on the wrong foot (source: Arci Caccia).
Leave a comment