Big rivalries related to the world of hunting, tensions and disagreements that at a certain point resulted in threats, in (presumed) attempts to dog theft, in slander and even in the suspension, by the police, of the firearms license for two of the litigators. Complaints and counter-complaints that have landed in court where it happens that the defendants become civil parties and the civil parties accused. And to navigate the complex world of this group of hunters from the area of Thiesi there are lawyers, prosecutors and judges who will have to determine where the truth lies and where any mutual responsibilities will be placed. Meanwhile, before the judge Valentina Nuvoli the long trial investigation ended in the trial that sees the accused Giovanni Basilio Bullitta, 67, of Nughedu San Nicolò, Davide Chessa, 35, of Ittireddu, Salvatore Culeddu, 31, of Bono and Massimiliano Baldinu, 48 years old from Sassari, accused for facts that happened in the Thiesi in 2014.
The civil parties are Antonio Marras, 50, and Giovanni Puggioni, 43, both from Thiesi. In particular, Bullitta (defended by the lawyer Antonio Secci) and Baldinu (assisted by Elisabetta Sotgia) would have, in competition with each other, attempted to commit a theft on the Marras farm, in the locality Corraile. While Bullitta, Chessa (assisted by Pietro Piras) and Culeddu (defended by Gian Marco Mura) are accused of having entered the company of Giovanni Puggioni, in the Punta 'e Figos area of Thiesi, after having forced the front door. They would then have tied the hunting dogs with the intent, according to the Prosecutor's Office, to steal them. In the same procedure, moreover, only Bullitta must also answer for the crime of slander because he allegedly "falsely accused Antonio Marras of threats and also Giovanni Puggioni and Giuseppe Puggioni, father of the latter - writes the prosecutor - with a complaint presented to the Sassari police headquarters".
Bullitta briefly claimed that Marras tried to wound him with a switchblade, while the two Puggioni would have blocked his way, preventing him and his friend Massimiliano Baldinu from continuing the journey by car. But the three, according to the prosecutor, "actually intervened to block the attempted theft in the Marras company". Even the latter (defended by the lawyer Carlo Pinna Parpaglia), however, ended up on trial for attempted aggravated injuries precisely because of that switchblade with which, according to the complaint presented by Bullitta, he tried to hit his "rival" twice in the abdomen "failing to hurt him - writes the prosecutor - for the prompt reaction of the offended person who dodged blows».
And here are the different procedural positions: Marras denounces Bullitta: «I recognized him while he was running away with another after having ripped up the wire mesh of my company where I keep 9 hunting dogs». And Bullitta denounces Marras: "I was just taking a walk with my friend Baldinu when Marras chased us, pulled out a knife and slashed twice at me." In June the discussion and then the sentence (La nuova sardegna).