Punctual and welcome as a beautiful pneumonia has arrived yet another appeal to the TAR of the LAC (ANTI hunting league). After filing an appeal against the fact that the Lombardy Region has not suspended the hunt (even before opening it) for drought on 11 August filed another appeal challenging the hunting calendar. The appeal in which the LAC has asked to suspend any collection of all huntable species will be discussed on 8 September. The reasons are always the same with the addition of imaginative details. It goes back to saying that the calendar cannot be adopted by law, forgetting that the TAR has rejected this motivation for ten years since the same is adopted by an administrative act on which the appeal is based; or that there was no ISPRA opinion, received instead by the Region again in April, only to complain that there was ONE deviation from the opinion itself.
Now it seems to us that at the LAC there is a doubt that the judges cannot read and have short memories, which we do not think at all; we would have to say that at this initial point of the review a good one "But please me" Totò would suit us well. But the beauty (so to speak) of the appeal is when LAC complains that no lower limit has been set than that deriving from the Laws for each species of migratory. Apart from the fact that as many as 5 species this year were temporarily excluded from the collection and for another 5 numerical limits were set. And so their assumption is that since 30 animals can be taken per day of migration for 55 hunting days for the 54.775 hunters, the possibility of killing 90 million head would have been admitted FOR EVERY SPECIES.
Now it seems to us that to get to hypothesize these data we need a good head, a good thought. I think any comment seems useless. If it weren't for the fact that, then, passing on to assess the situation of the so-called palmipeds and waders, the appeal, with a new method and harbinger of graphs and tables of the Lombardy Region bearing the data of the historical sampling of twenty years, proposes an even more daring thesis. And to say how we think, or rather we are wrong, let's evaluate the considerations relating to the Canapiglia species. We transcribe “the collection of Gadwall on the regional territory in the period 2002-2020 was irregular, with values between 500 and 1.000 specimens with a decreasing trend (per year). The forecast of a very high game bag (10 specimens a day for all hunting days for all hunters, so in the order of tens of millions of specimens it is not legitimate) "But if in twenty years it is certified that the maximum harvest has been of a thousand head per year, this year all hunters will hunt for gadflies all year round and will make them rise out of nowhere in order to be able to kill them. millions?
We firmly believe that there can be no judge so foolish as to be "gadget" by the nose by these smoky as well as senseless prejudicial affirmations. And in support of their arguments, it is often said about the decline in certified game also about the decrease in killing certified by the reading data of the badges. It is never said that hunters, unfortunately, also due to an excess of appeals and absurd interpretations of rules and difficulties in accessing the activity, they have dropped by 50% in twenty years. And won't half of the hunters likely lead to a reduction in withdrawals by half? On the issue of the climate situation, it is not that we are very happy people and citizens. But if this is the future that is being described to us, with increasingly hot summers, don't we think that we and the animals will adapt?
In the evolutions and even through the glaciations, the current situation has been reached, with how many mutations, including genetic ones? Or will it be the next hunting season or the next to extinguish and extinguish us? The data of the first week of the census of the alpine avifauna that are being carried out, reveal a slight increase in the number of broods in historical places and an INCREASE in the number of chicks compared to historical averages. The broods of black grouse, ptarmigan and rock partridge without severe atmospheric disturbances have gone BETTER. However, there is a statement that passes the lines and that deserves further reflection.
When LAC Speaking of drought, he states that "in addition to this, the VENATORY FURY is struck on wildlife, which finds no limits and obstacles whatsoever ..." Now it seems to us that if there is someone who has had a FURY in all these years, these are the gentlemen of the LAC, who in any case, always, with the most disparate reasons they have always pretended to badly label hunters, lawmakers and anyone who doesn't think like them. We are used to resisting and we will resist: Federcaccia Lombardia on 8 September will be at the TAR with its lawyers, alongside Lombardy region, to remind the judges of the correct legal and regulatory framework in which hunting takes place in Lombardy. (Source FIDC BRESCIA - THOUGHT-HUNTING)