With a short circuit that we find at least singular, reservists and representatives of that association that, more for ideological reasons that objective, at the time most opposed the "employer reserves" are today aligned on the same position and from the Marche, after similar externalizations at the national level a few days ago, they let hunters know that "Counter-order comrades: theIspra he is always right!". This is what the regional president of theArchicaccia Marche Gabriele Sperandio and Eps Domenico Patacchini, proudly reaffirming the failure of their reference associations to sign at national level the letter with which the other hunting associations - but obviously the attack is always and only aimed at Hunting Federation - invited the Regional Councils and Hunting Offices not to take into account the animal-environmentalist warning on the issue Key concepts and the adaptation of hunting calendars to the document of the European Commission revising these on the dates of pre-nuptial migration of birds.
A position not only due to the defense of the interests of hunters, who would be deprived of weeks of hunting without any real advantage for the species in question, but what matters most based on data and research - those that count for nothing for Arcicaccia and would be the failure of the FIdC, only to use them willingly when needed in appeals and in the drafting of calendars - which say something else and in the face of behavior by ISPRA in the data processing process anything but collaborative and open to technical-scientific confrontation with the Regions, the Autonomous Provinces and the stakeholders, acting openly and blatantly partisan.
An attitude that certainly harms the credibility and authority which should have a public institution at the service of all citizens. All this obviously goes very well for Arcicaccia and we just have to think that it probably is their registered hunters nothing is of interest to migratory hunting, now concentrating on pheasants and hares of which the reserves adhering to the EPS are full. Let us pass over, for the love of Patria, other points raised by the rather inconclusive communication, perhaps the result of nocturnal stomach ache rather than meditated hunting reflections. We limit ourselves to underlining that in the iconoclastic fury against Federcaccia and the "producers of weapons and ammunition of all kinds" (a pacifist inspiration? Or maybe the Arcicaccia card-holders from this season will use the camera instead of shotguns and overlapping?) the president Arcicaccia of the Marche also challenges his national president Christian Maffei, which also sits at the IUCN table with the UNA Foundation, the only Italian association not admittedly anti-hunt in that forum.
Perhaps President Maffei should employ 5 minutes of his time to explain to his regional team how things work in international organizations and in Europe, but also in the relations between the Associations that sit in UNA and maybe a little history of the latter. Sperandio seems to ignore, in fact, that Arcicaccia participated in the birth of the Una Foundation with Federcaccia and the “armourers”; its current national president Maffei is its vice president and its former national president Osvaldo Venetian he covers, but look at you, the role of vice president of the Scientific Committee.
But don't they know all this in the Marche? Basically the regional president Arcicaccia and the co-signatory of the EPS we seem to have at least confused ideas. It is not otherwise explained why in accusing Federcaccia and others of having close relations with environmental associations and of challenging theISPRA, Arcicaccia in the company of Eps actively supports and defends the positions of the anti-hunts! (source: Arch Hunting).