La Court of Cassation has been involved in these days of the rifle and the his football, considered by the judges of Piazza Cavour as part of the weapon. The sentence did not convince right away and in the last few hours theAUDA (Association of Gun Users). According to this acronym, it is not permissible that the stock is considered in this way since it is not part of the category: the list speaks of barrels, frames, drums, drums and shutters, but not kicks.
For the ADUA there is a great risk if the Palazzaccio sentence becomes jurisprudence. For the association, in fact, citizens in possession of a simple football (even as a spare) and who are in good faith would be convicted on charges of illegal possession, illegal carrying and illegal transport of parts of weapons. The impression is that the legal question is about to get to the heart and that in the next few days (not to mention the months) there will be other "episodes".
These gentlemen do not know what they are talking about. In their opinion, if I fall hunting and put the stock breaks and I have to replace it by force majeure, should I report the fact?
NAIL STUFF !!!