Then in 1996 he managed to win the competition as a traffic policeman. The no from the Police Headquarters arrived seven years ago at the expiry of the validity of the license. The hunter took advantage of the 30 years that have passed since the crimes and the subsequent rehabilitation, pointing out some similar cases where the hunting license had actually been granted. According to the judges of the TAR, the unreliability of the subject must be current and therefore cannot refer only to what happened a long time ago.
Among other things, the sentence had taken place six years after the crime, which can therefore be placed in 1982. Rehabilitation, then, must not be considered an irrelevant circumstance in assessing the question. This is why the hunter's appeal was accepted by the Piedmont Court, with the consequent annulment of the contested provisionor for a reasoned and thorough review by the administration.
You May Also Like ..
