Very strong proposals
The Lombard hunting associations are indignant at what happened in the commission, where it emerged that only Brothers of Italy and two Lega councilors supported amendments to Law 26/93. We do not go into the merits of the individual amendments: the presenters and creators of some directly already knew that some of their proposals were "strong", but we also know how certain negotiations work.
The real issue is that net of the individual Lega Nord councilors who support the amendments, only the Brothers of Italy at the party level is open to tackling hunting issues: the other components of the majority, and the opposition forces, instead of hunting, do not even want to hear about them. speak. Then in the discussion the amendments can be shared, refined, mediated, modified and even rejected, but it is considered unacceptable that in fact they are not even discussed by order of the team. Because it means not even wanting to discuss and tackle the problem that, for better or for worse, the one who proposes the amendment wants to solve.
The problem of recalls
If the hunting theme is a problem for certain political forces, if you do not want to seriously deal with the problem of calls, if someone is already thinking for the future season of opening the hunt directly in October without even trying to apply the calendar of the law, tell us immediately and tell it publicly, not in private meetings in which to speak ill of the absent, blaming them for the inability of the offices and the crushing of judges (source: FIDC).
Leave a comment