No institutional coercion
"It was unacceptable that a measure as sensitive and impactful on biodiversity as the hunting bill was examined with a simplified process and reduced timeframes. The withdrawal of the drafting body is an important first result for the opposition, which together prevented institutional and democratic pressure on an issue that concerns the protection of the country's natural heritage." Eleonora Evi, Patrizia Prestipino, and Annalisa Corrado of the Democratic Party declared this in a joint statement.
A controversial proposal
The Democratic Party has played a decisive role in stopping this attempt by the majority, which is now forced to backtrack. This is a first blow for those who wanted to shield a controversial proposal, which has drawn strong criticism from experts, citizens, and associations from the outset. We thank the Democratic Party senators who contributed to the outcome by collecting the crucial and weighty signatures, representing the group's presidency.
The hope of a comparison
We also thank the environmental and animal rights groups who have supported this battle with commitment, expertise, and mobilization. Now let's open a genuine, transparent, and evidence-based discussion. Law 157 on the protection of wildlife and the regulation of hunting is a foundation that must be defended and updated in the name of sustainability, not dismantled by coups." (Source: Hon. Eleonora Evi – Facebook Profile)
You May Also Like ..
