A sentence that is and will still cause much discussion. There Prefecture of Vicenza intervened some time ago to reject the request of an entrepreneur that he had done firearms license request. It is a man who owns one company specializing in the sale and recovery of precious metals (not just gold and silver). An activity of this type is very special and has attracted the attention of criminals.
There were three thefts against his company and for this reason he was persuaded to ask for a license. The Prefecture of Vicenza has rejected his request and also the judges of the Veneto Regional Administrative Court reasoned in the same way. The reason for the no seems incredible. For the administrative judiciary, the entrepreneur has only suffered property crime, while there would be no threats or even physical assaults or intimidation.
This is why for the TAR there is no need for a firearm license and the right to self-defense should not be protected. The question had been about the port of a gun for self-defense, but the raids of thieves in his firm they were not enough to convince judges and prefect. This is a precedent that could make jurisprudence and to be evaluated in depth.