In light of what we heard on November 22 in the interview on Canale Caccia & Dintorni, we are pleased to provide citizens with some clarifications, intended for those who want to read us: Not from us but from inside theFederated Association Fidc / CCT comes the proposal of Unique Association. We deduce that the President of the national FIDC spoke to them when he said that FIDC has many doubts about the single association. The calls made by Buconi, in his speech, on the status of single association "obliged" by the law, are related to the old law of 1942.
Far be it from us to re-propose the forced registration to the FIC / Fidc, it concerns a story not ours, if he, the Fidc and others come to terms with it. We propose to citizens, hunters, in full compliance with the Constitution, laws and freedom, of propose to society with a federation, union, or confederation, however, as a second degree body, by democratic decision of the leading groups of democratically elected associations.
There is no law that forbids it. There are a myriad of experiences, among these the Fidc, federation of federations, the Unavi, the CCT / Fidc. We need unitary intentions, sharing in the statutory purposes, we have proposed them publicly at our open congress, to which Buconi has done us the honor of speaking, having read our document, on that occasion we did not register criticisms, except for the worry of getting out of the fort. We will gladly read, for a peaceful comparison, the intentions that the Fidc will write and propose.
The stew in the territories is suicidal and, for hours we have listened to the silence, yet another, both on the intentions and on the associative model of the Unitary Entity rooted in the Regions. The “voluntary” values of the hunting world will be the first widespread choir of communication. And with what a voice! (Source: Arch Hunting).