Diana nr. 11 from 05 June 2012 arrived in newsstands all over Italy.
The most famous Italian hunting magazine is on newsstands with the nr. 11 of 2012.
SUMMARY - Highlights:
Made with THE HEART
Romagna is a land of hunters and gunsmiths, and cartridges act as the third leg of an ideal table. Visit to the RC company in Forlì, an industrial reality in the cartridge sector, established both nationally and internationally.
Text and photos by Roberto Aguzzoni
From the woodcock to the pheasant
Revives the ancient charm of hunting. He is tireless on any terrain, suitable for any wild and at home he becomes, thanks to his sociable and affectionate character, part of the family. A well-known Enci judge tells us about it.
Curated by Giorgio Bellotti
So BIRDS fly
They populate the earth in over 10 thousand species of which 470 in Italy (less than thirty huntable, over 250 nesting). The record of feathers goes to the swan: it has 25.216, turtledoves and woodpeckers from 2000 to 2500, ten thousand fewer than ducks. The teal is among the fastest (112 km / h).
Text by Rodolfo Grassi, photo by the Diana Archive
Squeeze on migration
The Region, almost slavishly following the ISPRA guidelines, has licensed a calendar containing restrictions that not even the EU requires. Some provisions are unexplained from a wildlife point of view. The hunting calendar of Emilia-Romagna has displeased migratory hunters, especially those from Romagna. The new text appears, as it were, at least somewhat contradictory, since it contains as a premise the consideration of the good results derived from management according to the previous calendar, then inexplicably emanates restrictive choices. The question relating to the sentence of the Constitutional Court (for those who were not updated, the Constitutional Court, following an appeal against the hunting calendar of the Abruzzo region, established that the regions cannot issue calendars by law, but only as an administrative act) it was not incisive in this regard, since the text (with an administrative act) almost completely replicates what was previously drafted in the draft law prior to the Constitutional Court ruling.