"The finger in the eye" by Bruno Modugno. This time I put the finger in the eye of the supporters of the single thought, which, coincidentally, starts from the left salottiera, rainbow, pacifist and do-gooder. Nothing to do with the left of the worker who has every reason to be pissed off.
di Bruno Modugno
I have it with the caviar left, with the fancazzista left, that reads the Republic and justifies the Roma thief and robber and that maybe tells you through its leaders to take an immigrant at home to supplement your pension. Its banks are sometimes certain judiciary, other times the heroes with their faces covered who destroy our cities and massacre policemen and carabinieri. And then, perhaps, the State grateful and subservient to the same single thought, dedicates a room to him in the Senate. I'm not done.
The single thought, which is so chic and that vote makers wrongly think it belongs to civil society, has also infected the ranks of the right, disrupted by Berlusconi's judicial and erotic events and divided into vegetable gardens and camarille. At the center of the single thought, in addition to the fashions I listed at the beginning, there is the flag of animalism, of false ecology, which is often planted at the height of city waste bins, in open landfills, in wars for the exploitation of waste. .
But the great glue of the single thought is the anti-hunting spirit that accompanies the refusal of weapons, without ifs and buts. This one-spirit lobby is a lobby that crosses all parties, from those of the educated and salottier left, to the ex-justicialists, to the new Christian Democrats scattered in a thousand streams, to the new right, to many police headquarters and courts of Italy. Meanwhile, it must be said that while the caviar left never hid its anti-hunting sentiments, Berlusconi's right showed up. in the golden years of his march on Rome, showing himself in favor of hunters, the reasoned use of weapons, even expanding the limits of personal defense. A referendum for the abolition of the gun license (it was the first of 24 referendums against hunting, national and regional, all lost by the presenters either because they were declared illegitimate or because they did not reach the percentage of voters required by law) was the 'unique to have seen a large participation. He was rejected with 84 percent of no! A sensational victory that says a lot about how Italian society is in favor of the legal possession and use of weapons, whether for hunting, sports or defense.
Other than a single thought! Berlusconi, before taking the field, had followed the debate on the abolition of the firearms license and had drawn conclusions from it. Hence the outstretched hand. Hence the projects on the right to defend oneself at home even with weapons. Hence the presentation of candidates close to the world of hunting. In do you want another? Storace, who presenting himself as governor of the Lazio Region asked for and obtained the votes of the hunters, only to turn his back on them when it came to building the useless park of Bracciano Martignano. Useless yes, but a manufacturer of armchairs. Today, if there is a cohesive party to fight the demands of hunters, having Brambilla (whose family trades in frozen fish) as the standard-bearer of the most vulgar and tearful animalism, this is Forza Italia. I could cite hundreds of examples. But also some rare exceptions, such as Senator Luciano Rossi, president of FITAV. It must be remembered. Di Pietro himself, having entered politics, had professed himself a hunter and had collected the votes of many who, in addition to being grateful to him for cleaning up the corners of the First Republic, recognized him love and interest in hunting.
I still have a couple of photographs that portray us together during a joyful UNCZA assembly (they are mountain hunters) in Piazzatorre, in that Val Brembana that saw him as the protagonist, in the past, of glorious hunting adventures together with his brother-in-law. Now Di Pietro has sided with the anti-fighters several times. The League remains to be faithful to us, to defend our values and the spirit of good and (alas) even bad hunting. As you can see, I don't discount anyone. But at least it's there and you can count on it. Thus was formed that lobby which, at the first news of a shooting, which perhaps had a depressed or jealous agent as its protagonist and author, tightens the brakes on the legislation concerning the purchase and possession of weapons, even for hunting.
The sentences concerning weapons are increasingly confused and contradictory, and in any case increasingly unfavorable to those who use them. Police headquarters and prefectures are increasingly stingy in granting firearms licenses. Sometimes, a bloodless quarrel, a swear word at a neighbor's address becomes a pretext for not granting the renewal of the hunting license to those who have always had a candid criminal record. In short, the single thought takes us unarmed, given that the Roma "enter your house and steal for social unease", as decided by some judiciary. Well, my finger hurts and I'm pissed. So I hope for you.