La LAV FVG remains incredulous at the statements, expressed in the media, by the councilor PICCIN, following the acts they destroyed two roof terraces in Campoformido. LAV FVG cannot accept that Councilor Piccin can continue to favor hunters, after most of the damage caused to wildlife was the work of the hunting world and hunters, which, thanks to an outdated law, still allows hunting activities despite the first point of the National Law 157/92, provides that " wildlife is an unavailable asset of the state ”e not hunters.
“We animal rights activists know well that any violent act is not acceptable and we have been telling the hunting world for more than 30 years. Precisely for this reason we cannot accept that politics favors hunters with laws and regulations, disadvantaging the life of the wild. In this regard we remember the National Bill PDLN n ° 9 of 2019 presented by Piccin to encourage hunters to slaughter thousands of animals, proposing the modification of article 19 of law 157/1992, which allows you to hunt all year round, from cars, enter parks, use night and thermal light sources, laser pointers and drones, widening more and more the species that can be killed. "
Also this year, an attempt is underway to subvert the Regional Laws that regulate hunting and protect the environment, to try to approve what is considered poaching on the national territory and going against the Constitution and the European Directives, only to satisfy the private interests of a small minority. Now, this further proposal that does not allow freedom of opinion, we find it truly unacceptable, especially given the insults that animal rights activists receive daily.
We remind you that when hunters in their business injure or kill other citizens they do not respond to the law like any other person, even if the crime (wounding and killing) they are even more serious than a burnt roof terrace. We wonder why no one is mobilized to free all the "other" citizens, those who are not hunters, to ensure that they can return to walk in the meadows and woods, together with their family and their animals without being afraid of being hit by a bullet. We ask the regional policy to respect life and the environment, putting an end to a limping legislation, continuously distorted according to the most diverse needs, favoring the single detail to the detriment of the ecosystem as a whole ".
Unavailable property of the state, therefore also of hunters citizens, who can dispose of it upon payment of a government concession (such as beaches), etc., etc.
Since I paid for the subscription to surf the internet, am I allowed to insult you as a person who goes around shooting to kill?
Congratulations to LAV. I remind you, dear animal rights activists of my boots, that the killings or ferments that take place in hunting are to be considered accidents. Just like what an unfortunate animal activist who drives a car and hits a pedestrian could commit. It cannot be punished as a deliberately intentional murder or injury. You are just a bunch of frustrated Ignorants.
If I invest and kill a pedestrian it's called street murder and I go to jail. That said, in my opinion every hunter should have the sacrosanct right to be able to shoot another hunter. So, just to count how many frustrated hunters there are!
But animal rights activists know that they cannot go for a walk in other people's meadows, as it is private property and must be respected as such! Only the hunter can enter a private fund, only after paying taxes and only to carry out the hunting activity