The proposing Minister found a defect of legitimacy regarding the hunting law of the Marche, therefore he sent the law to the preventive examination of the Council of Ministers which in turn, having satisfied the conditions, sent the law for examination by the Constitutional Court in order to ascertain its legitimacy.
One of the main reasons that led the Minister to report the illegality of the law to the Government, and therefore to the Constitutional Court, is the irregularity in having planned a hunting calendar on a three-year basis.
For conservationists this is not admissible as the regional hunting activity must be planned from year to year according to the information relating to wildlife, which obviously can change from year to year; according to environmental associations, the planning of the hunting calendar must not be based on the economic needs of the Region. Certainly not every three years as if it were an economic program.
The whole situation was welcomed with great satisfaction by the environmental associations who were the first to report the dissimilarity to the government; among all the LAC, League for the Abolition of Hunting, which drastically commented on what happened as "the logical ending of an act of pure arrogance and legislative ignorance by a regional political class now concentrated only in the lobbying protection of privileges acquired by a small elite of citizens, or hunters ”.
You May Also Like ..
