Here is the latest statement released by the association Arch Hunting: “We respect the freedom of opinion of all intellectuals, writers and those who do not think like us about hunting. Another thing, however, is the obligation to verification of "sources", an indispensable condition for giving truthful information. Following a "pre-established" ideology for personal use, in the press a combination of hunting and poisoned morsels has been proposed, it is not known whether it is derived from some text or, worse, baseless.
When it was still operational, the Forestry Corps, in the investigations opened on the use of poisoned "morsels", mostly referred to the critical conditions of farmers in the countryside. The phenomenon is also present in urban centers, where we do not think hunting is practiced. Ignoring the controversy, which does nothing but damage to wildlife, the environment, agriculture, we want to address the women and men of this country; i are gearing up Forestry Carabinieri, the institutions argue about it.
Why not equip the country with dogs and personnel who, province by province, can intercept and reclaim the areas and territories where there could be criminals who use these poisoned baits? Hunting dogs and hunters can be a resource of knowledge, of competence, of sure help in the patrols of the territories. But polemics are more useful to intellectuals. It makes more news