As disclosed by the Hunting Federation, with a statement full of falsehoods, the usual environmentalist and abolitionist acronyms distort the reality of the facts on Key Concepts review process, pushing on the accelerator in search of consensus based on emotion, without worrying about inaccuracies and real falsity on a legal level, biological and political, even more serious because they were taken up and supported by political exponents of the 5 Stars, including the Minister Costa, that in its high institutional role everything should be less than biased.
The Ministry of European Policies is by law the Dicastery which must confront the European Union on everything related to fauna, its management and its protection (Article 1 paragraph 7 bis law 157/92). There was therefore no "invasion of the field", but only the exercise of the duties assigned by law. The Ministry of European Policies carries out the coordination between the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Tourism and the Ministry of the Environment. Also here an obvious mistake of the environmentalist acronyms, who forget the role, always assigned by law to the Ministry of Agriculture, even stating that the drafting of the Key Concepts is a matter "indisputably of the Ministry of the Environment".
The press release signed by the environmental and animal rights acronyms then reports that the Ministry of European Policies intends to send the "Hunter data", a curious affirmation whose meaning, frankly, cannot be understood. The statement that the hunting season should be extended is totally false. On the contrary, the Hunting Associations intend to maintain the current dates provided for by the law, unlike what the environmentalist acronyms would like. for years they have been trying to limit hunting times with respect to national law.
So what is the truth? Simply that the KC review process conducted by the Ministry of the Environment did not take place according to the recommendations of the European Commission, which asked for a "transparent process involving all stakeholders including hunters". From this obvious circumstance an in-depth study was born among the Ministries, which has ascertained that there has not been the necessary consultation and that the competent Ministry of European Policies has not even been involved. Once again the world environmentalist-anti-hunt it seeks easy consensus, through the mystification of the reality of the facts.