The Third Session of the Court of Cassation ruled on the autonomy of the individual cases that are taken into consideration by thearticle 30 of the National Hunting Law ("Criminal penalties"). According to this interpretation by the judges of Piazza Cavour, the violation of the article gives rise to distinct crimes, united only by the fact that they are one the continuation of the other. The fact refers to a conviction by the Court of Bergamo against a man responsible for the continuous violation of the provision to the letter "and" of the article and the letter "h".
The appeal to the Supreme Court had been motivated by the fact that there were the details for a single violation, but in reality the man had been challenged the fowling and the fact of having killed two birds belonging to protected species. The two provisions have structural differences and even if they are part of the same article of Law 157 of 1992, the violations are autonomous. The one relating to the letter "e" has to do with the crime of danger, the second with the crime of damage. The appeal was therefore judged inadmissible and the man was forced to pay the court costs.