The hunting associations belonging to the control room (ANLC, ANUUMigratoristi, ARCICACCIA, ENALCACCIA, EPS, ITALCACCIA, FEDERCACCIA and CNCN) comment the latest proposal from LIPU: not a response to poaching, but an attack on legal and sustainable hunting. Colors, characters and message recall dark times, certainly fortunately not comparable, dominated and punctuated by dangerous ideological extremisms. With these tones, the Lipu returns to send one of its propaganda messages - all united by the common thread of the request for funds - this time lashing out against poaching.
Meritorious action that we too would share, if it were not just the obvious pretext to ask once again, but look, the closure of the hunt. “Special surveillance”, “If one is wrong, let everyone pay”. This is the beautiful message conveyed inlatest Lipu campaign which promotes the idea of a bill with an attached petition, which introduces a sort of Daspo but not against poachers, who laugh at various laws, regulations and limitations, given that their action takes place by definition outside the legality. Obviously the measure must target honest huntersguilty of not knowing what if not, in fact, to be hunters. So, even before seeing what will be foreseen in the national anti-poaching plan in preparation here is that the Lipu already says that it is not enough. Only one protected animal must be killed by a poacher for legal hunting in the area to be closed.
There have already been cases of "sensational poaching" which later turned out to be deaths from natural causes, or anything that had nothing to do with hunting. Of others, perhaps denounced with a lot of x-rays that showed dots everywhere, even in the tail feathers !, then nothing more was known. Goodness towards us? Or reverse once someone had asked for a better look at the undress? So, we ask ourselves already knowing the answer: do you want to take action to protect against an execrable crime or a bundle of all the grass with a provision that moreover immediately shows a blatant illegitimacy by not distinguishing between guilty and honest? It seems to us that Lipu has chosen this second way. But if she is convinced that she can travel it triumphantly, perhaps thanks to the position currently held by its president, this time too, as in the past, she will realize that the journey could be more uncomfortable than expected.