On the current and past situation of the Florentine Atc, it is necessary to work to make a minimum of clarity. In an article recently published in the press, we return to talk about the management of the areas of the capital. We join the perplexities of those who note the originality of the establishment of a profit-making company by a hunting association. Company born with the aim of working in ATC where, often and willingly, the aforementioned Association, in one way or another, could count on an absolute majority of representatives. Of course, in the past, the Tuscan management of our association has partially endorsed this questionable practice. Position that brought it into open contrast with the rest of the Arci Caccia and started a path that even caused a split.
Now these gentlemen have moved, passing arms and baggage in the majority association, with which they are evidently more in tune and we are working for a new course, based on transparency and fairness also in relations with the ATCs. This is to respond to the interview released by the former president of ATC 4, who calls us into question together with Fidc for the establishment of the very expensive service contract with the Oikos company. The former president, a farmer, but also a hunter (guess which card in his pocket) informs us that he has resigned, not for the ongoing investigations, but to leave the helm to a hunter, not finding the right guide of an ATC in hand to a farmer ... We would like to underline that, in one way or another, all the main associations were present in the ATC, perhaps represented by farmers or environmentalists, even if with very different weights, so those who are without sin throw the first stone , and that, in any case, what is there now is not the same Arci Caccia as it was then.
We have paid a heavy price on the altar of transparency and integrity. Now it is perhaps the case that someone else takes the same path