Browsing the social network Facebook, we came across a post from the animal rights committee that is collecting signatures for the so-called referendum for abolish hunting. We thus learned of a legal action brought by another group, attributable to the animal rights area, against the committee on alleged irregularities in the collection of signatures. In consideration of the fact that this referendum has been snubbed by the less extremist animal rights associations, that the results of the collection of signatures on this question are merciless, especially when confronted with the great interest sparked by serious issues such as euthanasia and cannabis legalization. In the light of all this, given that even these small groups of "fundamentalist animal rights activists" are pecked as Renzo's capons of Manzoni's memory, which may have been the real purpose that prompted the promotion of the referendum question? We would very much like to know (Source: Arch Hunting).
Prevailing opinion The ban on the production of synthetic meat launched by the state of Florida responds to the position of almost seven out of ten Italians (68%) who in 2024 declare themselves against the consumption of cell-based products. To say it is...
See more