The second section of the Regional Administrative Court of Tuscany dealt with the appeal presented by a man who was denied the renewal of the hunting license. The no had come from the Siena Police Headquarters due to a conviction reported by this person in May of 1968. It involved 30 days of imprisonment for abusive carrying of arms, a sentence lontana but considered decisive for the refusal.
For a sentence of the Court of Siena which dates back to a year and a half ago, moreover, the offense must be considered extinct after the amnesty has been granted. Despite this clarification of the judges, the renewal was rejected again and for this reason we turned to the TAR. According to the latter, with amnesty the penalty is extinguished only with the entry into force of the relative provision. Moreover, the amnesty itself does not the unlawfulness of the criminal sanction, however, it does not prevent judges from evaluating it independently from an administrative point of view.
Among other things, the offender is always obliged to provide constant evidence of good conduct for an adequate judgment regarding his future behavior. This is why the hunter's appeal cannot be admitted, a pronunciation that is undoubtedly debatable and that is quite intricate but that it will become jurisprudence in the evaluation of similar cases.