ANUUMigrators, Arci Caccia, Game Producers, Italcaccia e Free Hunt di Benevento have released this note: “In the past season the AVCC were 32 x a minimum of 25 hunters = a total of 800 minimum members. Current season 2019 24 AVCC x 30 = 720 + 13 endorsement areas x 6 = 78 total 798 minimum subscribers. In light of the numbers highlighted above, we ask ourselves: “what is the point of reducing AVCC and creating turn areas? Given that the only regulatory instrument currently in force is the hunting calendar which, among other things, does not provide for the hunting in turn which we therefore consider a big stretch.
If the endorsement areas are identified a priori as evidenced by the documents in our possession carefully forwarded by you, with the acclaimed presence of wild boars, then they are to be considered vocation areas (AVCC) and not endorsement areas, and therefore article 18 is totally to be modified / eliminated. We agree with reference to the identification in progress where there are critical issues in the release of endorsements, but not a priori. Further on the turn areas and just to name one there G9 and on the information collected there is an abnormal presence of wild boars and the surface of the same is such that it could be considered AVCC, moreover we believe that the others can be attributed directly to the teams operating in the vicinity.
We learned from the press release that everything had been agreed a priori with the Hunting Associations, a simple chat made last June, you cannot define it as a “concertation”. You have a proposal shared and signed by us where we hoped for the acceptance of the points of view that went in the direction of practicality The consultation must take place with the ATC which is responsible for TUC (territory useful for hunting) the atc does not have a legal representative but the members are both hunting and agricultural associations and not with individual actors who, although our members, act only and exclusively in conflict of interest. With regard to the reduction of the AVCC we had also foreseen it, but only at the express request of the Teams and not ex officio. The reduction of 8 (eight) AVCC except for the teams that had agreed, what will the remaining ones do?
They will try to launch a takeover bid on another AVCC in the face of democracy. We strongly reiterate that the number of 25 members is the minimum required to request an AVCC, like Salerno, Avellino and Caserta, 80% of the teams are in great difficulty and a consultation round would be enough to verify it. Areas have been merged to the detriment of proper management, eliminated cultivated areas and industrial areas, but this painstaking work had to be done for all AVCCs. The concertation had to have been prepared for us as soon as the draft was prepared, and before publication, it would have been right and in good manners, that it should have been agreed with the stakeholders, who, albeit reluctantly by someone, are the Samnite hunting associations. We hope that despite everything, we can meet again and think about the practical and common sense aspects that are the main thing, in the general interest that has always distinguished us ”.