Some homemade video illusionists "count lies". Already opponents of hunters in 1997 with the latest Anti-hunt referendum national team that was held in Italy, supported by Berlusconi, Fini and Pannella of which they were slavishly "gregarious". Today, hoping for a short memory, "standard bearers" and champions of hunting are proposed without saying with which rules. These are the plastic image of residual "Dwarfs and dancers" of the ars venandi. These characters are in tune with the most recent referendums, whatever they may say, against social hunting. Actors for years, those 2 or 3 of repeated "extras". We at ARCI Caccia have a history of facts in defense, sometimes solitary, of the law in force which, in its universally recognized system, is social hunting (except for the boycotts of the ATC and CA that other "hunters" have exercised by privileging interests other than those of hunters).
Silence, complicit in these behaviors, brings other "brands", different from ours. Said gentlemen have no respect for either St. Hubert, our protector. We smile at the ridiculous twists in progress. For the honest intellectual who oversees an association of volunteers, ours (other than salaries - neither lavish nor miserable - stuff of other parishes) with clarity and transparency, we always write what we think. We have fought against every proposed referendum in the past and today we have worked to "deflate", silence the current ones, of which only one has arrived in the "Supreme Court". The “little” political champions of the videos, for their own ends, wear various hunting “masks”, one for each occasion, in order to have the opportunity to make a living. You want to party, to self-styled associations of rurality, to local hunting associations, etc ... In their video-self-interviews, they feel at the center of the world, they speak from the "capital of Europe", they declare to organize "a million representatives" (not bayonets, goodbye) in all the earthly world and then offices, clubs, associates.
To have saints and blessed in every place, so they say, to cover theirs lack of knowledge of the relevant laws, but also of what is really happening, manipulate the truth about yesterday's and present referendums. "Metastases" of the bankrupt Hunters Party, have multiplied dividing into a thousand dry "rivulets". They smoke to hide the emptiness, the inconsistency of their representation and their role in the Company by selling off the cards to be mail-order insurers. To respond to the only "Referendum" on hunting, awaiting a judgment of validity, they are worried, for the interests of their party, that the Italians punish them with the abstention that can bury them: those who will remain, all of them! So on hunting and others that interest them, even before starting, they propose to vote "NO". Better to lose them to the detriment of the hunters.
Others, in a confused state, think of resorting to the reform of the hunting law which should acquire the requests of the referendums. They ignore that, being a divisive issue of the current majority, it will not be on any political agenda. And then who and what reform is being asked? The gurus who play more parts in comedy write! From the land of the Marche there is someone, a minor heir, perhaps illegitimate, of the deceased party of hunters, who ranted on social media about wanting to collect signatures on a popular initiative law. On what contents? Neither does he know it When he wanted to involve the Company and channel the "anger" in a constructive and positive way, UNAVI collected 700 thousand signatures for a popular initiative law which, as on many other occasions, remained in the drawers of the Chamber of Deputies.
What returns, on the other hand, is a solid "black" cord that binds the abolitionist SI Committee, isolated from environmental associations, with the abolitionists ethically chasing "marches on Rome", and then some bills presented with the desire for popular initiative laws: all united to abolish the law on social hunting. Strange coincidence, intentional convergences? Shame! In the meantime, dejavu are re-proposed, with conferences that recall the infamous Florentine pacts of Baglioni in which they wanted to change the law ... The best antidote to get out of the swamp where you have sunk as hunters will be "federate" - and well, as we asked with kind requests - and that the National Hunting Associations, by law, adopt a unitary democratic statute.
Everywhere, in Italy, in the Regions, in the Municipalities, to have a choir that speaks plurally and together with the Society. The common aim is to carry out popular hunting, to have uniform words and behavior among those who join. Giving assistance, sporting activities, dog lovers. Support a single Federation of "shooting" in CONI, make a stronger FITAV that it also promotes more together with the hunting associations, even for more Olympic medals to the Italians.