The interpretation of thearticle 22 paragraph 7 of regional law 26/93 than about the signature of the migratory fauna on the card states: “the signature must take place, indelibly, on the hunting place, after the ascertained killing ". Against this rule, the supervisory bodies are raising administrative fines for those who do not immediately mark migratory game but do so only at time of collection.
Sanctions that are applied unitarily for each unmarked item. In response to an official request for clarification presented by Federcaccia Lecco the response of the Regional Manager Roberto Daffonchio is as follows: "It is believed that the current wording of paragraph 7 introduced with regional law nr 37 of 28.12.2017 being more detailed than the state law, should be required to main reference by all personnel in various capacities in charge of hunting surveillance activities".
Frankly, an unclear clarification from the Lombardy Region. We will see how the UTR will behave in the face of the appeals we are presenting to the high reports to hunters, since it is in their power to cancel the minutes or keep them.
The Lombardy Region, by issuing a regional law on the marking of migratory game on the hunting card; has committed an offense because of a regional law; It can NEVER overturn a state law;
because the state-regions agreement is clear:
The Italian state to adapt to the obligations deriving from Italy's membership of the European Union, for the case of the EU PILOT 6955/14 / ENVI; issued a law 122/2016, of 7 July 2016, which entered into force on 23.07.2016, published in the Official Gazette No. 158 of 8.7.2016, general series 16GO0134.
In article 31 the aforementioned law 122 mentions verbatim; that to the law 157/1992, to the art 12 paragraph 12, the paragraph 12 bis must be added, which mentions verbatim that "migratory game must be marked on the hunting card immediately after killing" !!!
Now that some politician or regional manager to please some friend, or whoever voted for it, has combined this scam;
I want to see in case of contestation to the administrative sanction imposed by the guards, according to the law of the state; WHICH WILL BE THAT JUDGE THAT WILL GO AGAINST A LAW OF THE STATE, to give reason to the hunter, even if he has performed in good faith what the region imposed on him, even printing it on the hunting card.
For me, the other regions must also adapt to what a state law requires, especially those such as Liguria, Veneto, Tuscany, where what they have written is invalidated by law 122/2016.
I am amazed that some associations for their own gain, did not notify their members that the state law 157/92 had changed, sending them into disarray and being sanctioned ???
Now I would like to see who pays the administrative penalties imposed on hunters by the hunting guards (€ 154,00 per person)