The Tuscan Free Hunting National Association takes stock of the question of huts for hunting use, "clarity and cagnara".
The communiqué on the development of the "fixed stalking" issue in Tuscany has aroused a cagnara as exaggerated as it is clearly empty and pretext. Trying to take stock of the situation of the huts, the Free Hunting of Lucca has only provided a brief and simplified summary (however very similar to the one published by the Nation on February 26) and above all correct, of the real risk incurred by Tuscan hunters holding fixed stalking. . In this summary we have referred (we believe with absolute grace and without any excess) to the different approach by CCT, Fidc, Anuu and Arcicaccia to the complex problem. Unfortunately, in the grace of a very normal dialectic of hunting politics, the response was made with accents of unprecedented harshness, bordering on personal offenses, and with an arrogance that closely resembles that of a certain political party whose leaders not only do not they accept criticism and comparisons but “democratically” expel those who allow themselves to think for themselves.
Beyond the much heralded "certainties" on the absolute legitimacy of Law 65 and, above all, beyond the tones over the top, the truth is only one: if three months of extension had not been obtained, March 25.000 could have represented the beginning of the end for XNUMX huts! All the rest, as usual, are just gossip and political games.
On the other hand, to definitively clarify the issue, avoiding the continuation of a sterile and harmful controversy, it would be enough to ask for the opinions of the Legislative Offices of the Council and Council and, in the meantime, work hard to solve the problem at its root by soliciting a modification of the national law defining hunting stalks no longer structures subject to administrative authorizations but artifacts falling within free construction.
Having said this, however, it is necessary to reiterate a fundamental concept:
Free Hunting has no intention of "stealing the trade" from the various anti-hunting organizations. Just thinking about it is not only insultingly offensive, but it demonstrates a profound ignorance of the role played by this association in over half a century of great trade union struggles.
No, Free Hunting has always and only had at heart the legitimate interests of the hunters, for which it has fought and will continue to fight, without flattening out and without renouncing its statutory principles. Sacrosanct and indispensable principles on which, unfortunately, someone still tries to make ridiculous irony, playing on that adjective "FREE" which does not mean anarchy but intellectual independence even before political independence.
National Free Hunting Association
(March 3, 2014)